OK, fols here it is….
You should all be proud of the Lojban languge. I
endorse this language and have, after further
consideration, found it pleasing and original. You
should all check this out.
*dt*


OK, fols here it is….
You should all be proud of the Lojban languge. I
endorse this language and have, after further
consideration, found it pleasing and original. You
should all check this out.
*dt*










to "dt":
I know that your ringing endorsement
of Lojban was dripping with sarcasm.
All I wanted to know was why you
thought the original Loglan to be
superior to Lojban.
No, the ringing endorsement was really true, not
sarcastical.
But, I don’t approve of what I percieve to be a
large dose of ‘linguistic affirmative action’ that
Lojban seems to possess. In addition, the
etymology seemed a little bizarre, especially since
few chinese would recognize the Lojban derivatives
as their own. I think Lbjan needs a lot more
research whether native speakers will like this
system better.
for example: suupose they were going to
lobjanizetheis word:
think
Since they don’t use th, it might come out something
like ‘sinki’ I would prefer as an english speaker,
to have a very different word, than a mutilated, and
frankly unatttractive version of my own language.,
I bet that’s how a lot of people out there feel.
This is lojban’s main shortcomings. other than
that, the endorsement stands.
*dt*