<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FAQ: Representing IPA Phonetics in ASCII</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.naturalanguages.info/faq-representing-ipa-phonetics-in-ascii-3/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.naturalanguages.info/faq-representing-ipa-phonetics-in-ascii-3</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:22:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.naturalanguages.info/faq-representing-ipa-phonetics-in-ascii-3/comment-page-1#comment-4879</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.naturalanguages.info/faq-representing-ipa-phonetics-in-ascii-3#comment-4879</guid>
		<description>
  &lt;p&gt;In article &lt;smryanD257JI....@netcom.com&gt; smr...@netcom.com (Player) writes: &lt;br /&gt; &gt;Have Proto-whatever been developed for other families besides &lt;br /&gt; &gt;IE? &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;Yes, but no other is as fully fleshed-out; some are little more than &lt;br /&gt; lists of reconstructed forms for cognate lexical items. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Can anyone out there list those families for which a plausible &quot;proto- &lt;br /&gt; grammar&quot; has been reconstructed? &#160;I&#039;ve read one for Finno-Ugric and I&#039;ve &lt;br /&gt; heard that one exists for Proto-Semitic, though I&#039;ve never seen it &lt;br /&gt; described. &#160;References would be nice if it&#039;s not too much bother. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-- &lt;br /&gt; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160;Daniel &quot;Da&quot; von Brighoff &#160; &#160;/\ &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160;Dilettanten &lt;br /&gt; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; (d...@midway.uchicago.edu) &#160;/__\ &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; erhebt Euch &lt;br /&gt; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160;/____\ &#160; &#160; &#160;gegen die Kunst! &lt;br /&gt;
  
  &lt;/p&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In article &lt;smryanD257JI&#8230;.@netcom.com&gt; <a href="mailto:smr...@netcom.com">smr&#8230;@netcom.com</a> (Player) writes: <br /> &gt;Have Proto-whatever been developed for other families besides <br /> &gt;IE? </p>
<p>Yes, but no other is as fully fleshed-out; some are little more than <br /> lists of reconstructed forms for cognate lexical items.  </p>
<p>Can anyone out there list those families for which a plausible &quot;proto- <br /> grammar&quot; has been reconstructed? &nbsp;I&#8217;ve read one for Finno-Ugric and I&#8217;ve <br /> heard that one exists for Proto-Semitic, though I&#8217;ve never seen it <br /> described. &nbsp;References would be nice if it&#8217;s not too much bother.  </p>
<p>&#8211; <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Daniel &quot;Da&quot; von Brighoff &nbsp; &nbsp;/\ &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;Dilettanten <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; (d&#8230;@midway.uchicago.edu) &nbsp;/__\ &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; erhebt Euch <br /> &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;/____\ &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp;gegen die Kunst! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

