Natural languages, communication, etc

Archive for July, 2012

Re: The perpetual calendar

- — -

Peter Moylan <gro.nalyomp@retep> writes:
> Skitt wrote:
>> Hatunen wrote:
>>> "Peter T. Daniels" wrote:

>>>> I wonder whether sjedvnull would be satisfied with, If you’re
>>>> baptized in the Name of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, then
>>>> you’re a Christian.

>>> There are those who claim so.

>> Just to provide some data — I was so baptized (at the age of 16), but
>> it didn’t make me a Christian, at least, not in my beliefs.  I mean,
>> even if I do or say certain things, maybe my fingers are crossed behind
>> my back. <g>

> At my confirmation my fingers definitely were crossed.  In addition, I
> was muttering under my breath "a promise made under duress is not
> legally binding".

> Nobody asked me whether I wanted to be baptised or confirmed, and in any
> case I was too young to make an informed decision.  Especially in the
> case of the baptism.

Seems a bit pointless to me.  You might as well go through it
wholeheartedly.  After all, if it’s rubbish then it’s harmless – and if
it’s not you probably wanted to do it.

Online waterways route planner            | http://canalplan.eu
Plan trips, see photos, check facilities  | http://canalplan.org.uk

.
posted by admin in Uncategorized and have Comments (7)

Re: The perpetual calendar

On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 15:59:23 -0700, Hatunen
<hatu…@cox.net> wrote in
<news:68tlo51lbskir5ingugspogfsu33pcguo9@4ax.com> in
sci.math,sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.lang,alt.usage.english:

> On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 18:57:10 -0500, "Brian M. Scott"
> <b.sc…@csuohio.edu> wrote:

[...]

>>That may be another point of contention: pleasantly cool
>>means about 25 , and really good weather starts at about
>>30 .  And 5:30 or 6:15 is a nice time to go to bed.
> I do hope you mean celsius degrees.

I do indeed; Rob’s posting from Oz.

[...]

Brian

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have Comments (12)

Re: The perpetual calendar

On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 06:15:20 -0800 (PST), "Peter T. Daniels"

- — -

<gramma…@verizon.net> wrote:
>On Feb 28, 2:57 am, "sjdevn…@yahoo.com" <sjdevn…@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Feb 27, 3:48 pm, "Peter T. Daniels" <gramma…@verizon.net> wrote:

>> > On Feb 27, 1:40 pm, "sjdevn…@yahoo.com" <sjdevn…@yahoo.com> wrote:

>> > > On Feb 27, 9:57 am, "Peter T. Daniels" <gramma…@verizon.net> wrote:
>> > > > On Feb 27, 2:29 am, "sjdevn…@yahoo.com" <sjdevn…@yahoo.com> wrote:

>> > > > > On Feb 27, 12:20 am, "Peter T. Daniels" <gramma…@verizon.net> wrote:
>> > > > > > On Feb 26, 9:04 pm, "sjdevn…@yahoo.com" <sjdevn…@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> > > > > > > At that point you claimed they are "by definition, not Christians".

>> > > > > > Sigh. The essence of Christian dogma is encapsulated in the Nicene
>> > > > > > Creed.

>> > > > > That is a different statement than the original, and would appear to

>> > > > It may be a different "statement," but it conveys the obvious intent
>> > > > of the original statement.

>> > > No, it conveys a different intent, which is obvious if you reread your
>> > > original question: "Doesn’t _every_ extant Christian church use the
>> > > Nicene Creed? (With or without the _filioque_.)" That’s clearly

>> > Since it’s my question, I think I am entitled to state what its intent
>> > was.

>> Whatever you might have meant, your words didn’t convey it. With an
>> ambiguous statement, it’s certainly reasonable to admit that you were
>> wrong and revise your statement–I’ve certainly made ill-formed
>> statements in this thread and others, and altered them.

>> In this case, though, it’s pretty obvious from the wording what you
>> meant by the original question, and if you’re now asserting that you
>> didn’t mean to ask whether all Christians actually use some real
>> wording of the Nicene Creed then I absolutely believe you’re lying. I
>> have no further interest in continuing this thread if you’re going to
>> insist otherwise (and several other people in this thread also took
>> your words to mean what they meant to me, so I don’t feel that’s an
>> idiosyncrasy of mine).

>See recent posting on mathematicians’ restrictive interpretation of
>unexpressed quantifiers in English.

>> > (I gather, from the sources you cite, that you are some sort of
>> > conservative Catholic, the type that in Chicago flocked to the one
>> > parish in the city that had dispensation from Rome to say Mass in
>> > Latin, so I wouldn’t be surprised if you don’t know anything about
>> > such questions.)

>> Have fun with that (Fwiw, I’m a liberal atheist).-

>Then why on earth are you not familiar with recent (i.e., less than a
>century and a half old) scholarship on topics on which you pontificate?

Do you mean he’s acting like the Pontiff or that he’s bui


   ************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatu…@cox.net) *************
   *       Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow         *
   * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have No Comments

Re: The perpetual calendar

Peter Moylan <gro.nalyomp@retep> writes:
> Admittedly the common "off by one" errors are often caused by
> zero-based subscripting. With most programming languages, though,
> such an error will make itself evident the first time you run the
> program, when you run off the end of the array; and the exception
> information will quickly lead you to the cause of the crash. It’s
> safe to declare subscript ranges in any way that is natural to the
> application, as long as the generated code includes range
> checks. The main thing that makes C so unsuitable for real-world
> applications is the paucity of run-time checks.

The existence of which, of course, along with the concommitant
overhead, being one of the main reasons that other languages were
considered unsuitable for real-world applications.

Fast, safe, and easy to write a compiler for.  Pick two.


Evan Kirshenbaum                       +————————————
    HP Laboratories                    |When you’re ready to break a rule,
    1501 Page Mill Road, 1U, MS 1141   |you _know_ that you’re ready; you
    Palo Alto, CA  94304               |don’t need anyone else to tell
                                       |you. (If you’re not that certain,
    kirshenb…@hpl.hp.com             |then you’re _not_ ready.)
    (650)857-7572                      |              Tom Phoenix

    http://www.kirshenbaum.net/

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have Comments (7)

Re: The perpetual calendar

On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 11:09:57 -0800, David Harmon

<sou…@netcom.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:56:25 -0500 in alt.usage.english, tony cooper
><tony_cooper…@earthlink.net> wrote,
>>As far as I can tell, the only employers that are closed on
>>President’s Day are government offices, schools, and banks.  To the

>There is no such holiday as "President’s Day" to US government offices.
>http://www.opm.gov/Operating_Status_Schedules/fedhol/2010.asp

Interesting. I had assumed there was. And I see that there is one
in some states. Certainly businesses think there is one in their
sales advertisements.


   ************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatu…@cox.net) *************
   *       Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow         *
   * My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have Comments (18)

Re: The perpetual calendar

On Sun, 28 Feb 2010 21:39:57 +1300, PaulJK
<paul.kr…@paradise.net.nz> wrote in
<news:hmda2a$uic$1@news.eternal-september.org> in
sci.math,sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.lang,alt.usage.english:

[...]

> Objects with negative weight do not need escape velocity
> to escape to space. They can ascend slowly with
> impressive majestic grace.

Shopping baskets have a hard time achieving impressive
majestic grace, even when filled with negative watermelons.

Brian

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have Comment (1)

Re: The perpetual calendar

In sci.astro message <FHhin.45627$Ym4.6…@text.news.virginmedia.com>,
Sat, 27 Feb 2010 23:14:45, the Omrud <usenet.om…@gEXPUNGEmail.com>
posted:

>It’s a long-standing irritation of non-Americans on Usenet that some
>Americans on Usenet seem to think that Usenet is populated by
>Americans.

You give rather little obvious indication of not being one yourself,
though I see that you speak en-GB.


 (c) John Stockton, nr London, UK. ?…@merlyn.demon.co.uk  Turnpike v6.05  MIME.
 Web  <URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/> – FAQqish topics, acronyms & links;
  Astro stuff via astron-1.htm, gravity0.htm ; quotings.htm, pascal.htm, etc.
 No Encoding. Quotes before replies. Snip well. Write clearly. Don’t Mail News.

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have Comments (2)

Re: The perpetual calendar

Hatunen filted:

>On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 12:23:38 +0000, Chuck Riggs
><chri…@eircom.net> wrote:

>>Very true, but I still don’t understand what the "earlier
>>unpleasantness with the tea bags" meant.

>You obviously don’t know that in the latter part of the 18th
>century the British East India Company was shipping its product
>in tea bags.

>Thousands and thousands of teabags floating in Boston Harbor….

That’s the absurd image in the minds of most readers at this point, but what
containers *were* used to transport tea?…was it in fact wooden crates, as I’ve
usually seen the BTP portrayed, or might the tea actually have been packed into
burlap sacks (therefore *technically* "tea bags") for shipment?…r


"Oy!  A cat made of lead cannot fly."
 - Mark Brader declaims a basic scientific principle

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have Comments (24)

Dont support terrorism

Jai Hind,

Will u help terrorism?
How much u will pay to support terrorism?
I know… you will throw the answer as ‘NO’ immediately
to the person who asks such a foolish question.

Now, the facts…
We knowingly/unknowing ly pay Rs 12 Crores to terrorism.
How?
Most of the Indians(staying in India or abroad) download
MP3s of new Hindi movies/albums from the site Songs.pk regularly.
Songs.pk is a Pakistani site. It makes profit of Rs 12 Crores per day.
& it supplies all this illegal money to terrorism. Using this site
simply means supporting terrorism.

Now, the same question again…
Will you now knowingly pay Rs 12 Crore per day to terrorists?
If the expected answer is again NO,
then please don’t use pk site to download songs.

Don’t support Terrorism.
Don’t use Songs.pk.
[All the facts as per research by TV9 News Channel]
http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/Pak-song-sites-may-be-used-to…

http://blog.laksha.net/2009/01/virus-alert-songspk-beware-of-hackers….

www.keegy.com/…/www-songs-pk-songs-pk-website-download-bollywood-so…

http://www.saveondish.com/forum/alert-for-those-who-download-songs-so…

http://www.rediff.com/news/2009/jan/06mu…er-war.htm

Jai Hind,
Athish Ravikanth
9379030409, 09426349462, 9916110231, 9945969917
bharatjagrutimor…@gmail.com
http://groups.google.co.in/group/bharat-jagruti-morcha?hl=en

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have Comment (1)

Norwegian stronghold?

Yesterday NBC did a feature on 30k cross country, which has been the
bailiwick of Norway for like forever, and how humiliated Norwegians
were that Sweden won it. They interviewed a Norwegian (in civilian
clothes, so likely not connected with the team) whose English was
fluent and idiomatic — except he said "We had a stronghold on that
sport." That seems a perfectly reasonable thing to say — though the
stress ought to be "strong hold" — but just not English, which would
be "stranglehold."

Which got me wondering: Was he calquing a Norwegian term
("stranglehold" not being a particularly everyday expression), or
misremembering "stranglehold"?

And, connection between "strangle" and "strong"?

posted by admin in Uncategorized and have Comments (10)